1. The first question asks who caused the difficulties that led to the bargain in Batsakis v. Demotsis. The correct answer is: No particular party was at fault. 2. The second question concerns whether the woman selling her annuity in Post v. Jones was a good or bad bargain. The correct answer is: Good Bargain: The boyfriend's associates paid a lower price to account for the risk that they might not be paid. 3. The third question asks how the case likely worked out based on the previous answers and Batsakis v. Demotsis. The correct answer is: The contract was enforceable, because neither party was at fault for the circumstances and the value paid was fair. Summary: - In Batsakis v. Demotsis, no party was at fault for the difficulties leading to the bargain. - In Post v. Jones, the bargain was good because the price reflected the risk. - Therefore, the contract was enforceable due to fairness and mutual intent.